ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT

The MICHELIN Guide is committed to ensuring digital accessibility for people of all abilities. We are continually improving the user experience across the site and working to raise our accessibility standards.

Compliance status

The RGAA – General Accessibility Guidelines for Digital Services - defines requirements for designers and developers to improve accessibility for all users.

Currently, the MICHELIN Guide website is not compliant with RGAA 4.1.2. The non-compliances are listed below.

Non-accessible content

1. Does each informative image have a textual alternative?
2. Is each decorative image properly ignored by assistive technologies?
3. Is each image caption, when necessary, correctly associated with the corresponding image?
4. Does each frame have a frame title?
5. For each frame with a title, is the title relevant?
6. On each web page, is information not conveyed by color alone? Is this rule respected?
7. On each web page, is the contrast between text color and background color sufficiently high (except in special cases)?
8. On each web page, are the colors used in interface components or graphical elements conveying information sufficiently contrasted (except in special cases)?
9. Is each link explicit (except in special cases)?
10. Is each script, when necessary, compatible with assistive technologies?
11. Is each script controllable by keyboard and any pointing device (except in special cases)?
12. On each web page, are status messages properly conveyed by assistive technologies?
13. For each web page, is the generated source code valid according to the specified document type (except in special cases)?
14. For each web page with a page title, is the title relevant?
15. On each web page, is each language change indicated in the source code (except in special cases)?
16. On each web page, are tags not used solely for presentation purposes? Is this rule respected?
17. On each web page, is information structured using appropriate headings?
18. On each web page, is the document structure coherent (except in special cases)?
19. On each web page, is each list properly structured?
20. On the website, are style sheets used to control the presentation of information?
21. On each web page, does the information remain understandable when style sheets are disabled?
22. On each web page, is the text still readable when font size is increased to at least 200% (except in special cases)?
23. On each web page, is each link whose nature is not obvious visually distinguishable from surrounding text?
24. On each web page, for each element receiving focus, is the focus clearly visible?
25. For each web page, can content be presented without loss of information or functionality, and without requiring vertical scrolling for a window height of 256px or horizontal scrolling for a window width of 320px (except in special cases)?
26. Does each form field have a label?
27. In each form, are fields of the same nature grouped together when necessary?
28. In each form, is the label of each button relevant (except in special cases)?
29. In each form, is input validation used appropriately (except in special cases)?
30. In each form, is input validation accompanied, when necessary, by suggestions to help correct input errors?
31. Can the purpose of an input field be inferred to facilitate autofill with user data?
32. Are content grouping areas present on multiple web pages (header, main navigation, main content, footer, and search engine) reachable or skippable?
33. On each web page, is there a skip link or quick access link to the main content area (except in special cases)?
34. On each web page, are additional contents appearing on hover, focus, or activation of an interface component, when necessary, accessible via keyboard?
35. On each web page, are functionalities usable or available through a complex gesture also available through a simple gesture (except in special cases)?

Preparation of this accessibility statement

This statement was prepared on: 10th of December, 2024

• Firefox Code and Accessibility Inspectors
• Browsers extensions : WCAG Color Contrast Checker, HeadingsMap, Web Developer, RGAA Assistant
• Windows Loop
• W3C HTML validator
• Last reviewed on: 10th of December, 2024

Feedback and contact information

If you experience any accessibility barriers or need content in an alternative format, please fill out this form.

Enforcement procedure

If you are not satisfied with our response, you may file a complaint via the enforcement procedure:

• Write a message to the Defender of Rights: (https://formulaire.defenseurdesdroits.fr/)
• Send a letter via postal service:
  Défenseur des droits
  Libre réponse 71120
  75342 Paris CEDEX 07
  France